← All BidSkim comparisons
Tender intelligence comparison

BidSkim vs Contracts Advance

BidSkim has the higher current public-evidence score: 83/100 versus 61/100. Compare the underlying features, price references and public evidence before deciding which product fits your workflow.

Scores and prices

The two products at a glance

Tender intelligence product

BidSkim

83/100

BidSkim says it scores public-sector notices against a supplier profile and sends a daily shortlist with reasons.

Feature score83
Value score84
Complete features9/14
Tender-alert benchmark
£0/mo
Free
Full-package benchmark
£155/mo
Predict
Full intelligenceSmart matchers
Tender intelligence product

Contracts Advance

61/100

Contracts Advance provides tailored tender alerts, with higher plans adding renewals, research and market analysis.

Feature score55
Value score74
Complete features8/14
Tender-alert benchmark
£116.58/mo
Search
Full-package benchmark
£249.92/mo
Explore
Intelligence + workflowSmart matchers

The combined score is 68% feature depth and 32% value. A complete feature scores more than a partial feature. Value considers both the tender-alert and full-package price benchmarks, price transparency and billing basis. Features may sit on higher tiers than the headline alert plan.

Feature evidence

Fourteen capabilities compared

Yes requires public evidence that the complete capability exists in at least one current plan. Partial means narrower or adjacent functionality. If the research did not establish the capability, it is marked not offered.

CapabilityBidSkimContracts Advance
AI or semantic matchingYes

Monitor and Predict provide complete ongoing profile-based matching: every new notice is scored 0-100 against services, region, value and certifications with written reasons. The Free plan's one-off scan is plan gating, not an incomplete paid capability.

BidSkim features ↗BidSkim pricing ↗
Not offered

Semantic, machine-learning, AI or supplier-profile relevance matching is not stated on the reviewed product pages.

Buyer profilesYes

Predict includes structured cross-notice buyer profiles with requirements, spend and award history, top suppliers, contacts, renewals and researched notes. Public data documentation states that repeated notices are deduplicated and lifecycle notices are connected; Predict gating does not downgrade the capability.

BidSkim features ↗BidSkim pricing ↗BidSkim data coverage ↗
Partial

Explore includes structured Buyer Analysis with named contacts, previous suppliers, financial values and procurement-market insight; lower plans do not list it, and canonicalisation, deduplication or entity-resolution handling is not established.

Current pricing ↗Detailed software page ↗
Supplier profilesYes

Predict includes structured supplier and incumbent profiles that aggregate wins, buyers, regions, categories, awarded values, held contracts and renewal exposure across the award record. This is a complete current-plan capability even though public pages do not describe the exact alias-resolution algorithm.

BidSkim features ↗BidSkim terms ↗
Partial

Explore provides structured competitor analysis with prior awardees, current public contracts and comparative market context. Lower plans do not list it, and canonicalisation, deduplication or entity-resolution handling is not established.

Current pricing ↗Detailed software page ↗
RenewalsYes

Predict provides complete renewal timing signals built from public award, contract, modification and termination records. Exact dates, durations and extension options are converted into source-linked planning dates, refreshed daily and ranked against the subscriber profile; the provider explicitly distinguishes these from confirmed re-tender dates.

BidSkim features ↗BidSkim data coverage ↗BidSkim pricing ↗BidSkim contract timing method ↗
Yes

Discover and Explore include Active Contracts and identify likely re-tenders using current holder, supplied goods or services, financial value and expected date to market; case studies document contract-expiry alerts.

Current pricing ↗Detailed software page ↗
Similar contractsYes

Predict surfaces comparable historical awards matched by contract scope rather than shared keywords, including winners, values, terms, bid counts and SME status where published. Higher-tier gating does not make the implemented capability partial.

BidSkim features ↗BidSkim data coverage ↗
Yes

Explore's Market Analysis displays award notices for products or services similar to the customer's offering and the competitors awarded them.

Detailed software page ↗
Buyer document corpusNot offered

The reviewed public pages do not establish a full searchable corpus of buyer-authored documents designed to surface upcoming work.

BidSkim product ↗BidSkim features ↗
Not offered

The reviewed public pages do not establish a full searchable corpus of buyer-authored documents designed to surface upcoming work.

Detailed software page ↗
Buyer requirementsYes

Predict buyer profiles organize insurance, certifications, social-value rules, local preferences and pass/fail gates drawn from public buyer records and documents. The capability is complete on Predict; Monitor exclusion is plan gating.

BidSkim features ↗BidSkim pricing ↗
Not offered

Extraction or organisation of participation conditions, certifications, policies, evaluation criteria or recurring buyer requirements is not stated on the reviewed product pages.

Requirements planningPartial

Predict is positioned for preparing certifications, evidence and answers before a tender goes live using buyer requirements and likely renewals; no separate task-based readiness workflow is described.

BidSkim pricing ↗BidSkim features ↗
Not offered

The product supports pipeline and resource planning for likely re-tenders, but a requirements-readiness, evidence-gap or compliance-planning workflow is not stated.

Award historyYes

The service offers a one-off 12-month matched-award report on Free and five years of connected buyer and award history, comparable awards and supplier intelligence on Predict. Tier-specific lookback and access do not make the capability partial.

BidSkim data coverage ↗BidSkim features ↗
Yes

Explore's Market Analysis displays contract award notices and previous suppliers; lower plans do not list this analysis.

Detailed software page ↗
FrameworksYes

BidSkim badges frameworks, DPS and dynamic markets, filters out non-joinable call-offs and modifications, and shows application/end dates, supplier caps and route-in information.

BidSkim features ↗
Yes

A customer case study documents a forward pipeline of live contracts and frameworks extending five years, with expiry dates used for planning.

Switch2 Energy case study ↗
Competitor trackingYes

Predict provides complete named-supplier tracking across public-sector wins, buyers, awarded values, regions, categories and contracts nearing expiry. Monitor exclusion is plan gating, not an incomplete implementation.

BidSkim features ↗BidSkim pricing ↗
Yes

Explore includes Competitor Analysis showing current contract holders and prior awardees, while lower plans do not list it.

Current pricing ↗Detailed software page ↗
Exports or APINot offered

No CSV/Excel export, API, webhook or CRM integration is documented on the reviewed pages; the pricing page says large teams needing exports may be better served by enterprise platforms.

BidSkim pricing ↗
Yes

The current pricing table lists Fully Exportable Data on Search, Discover and Explore. Export format, API, webhook and CRM support are not publicly specified.

Current pricing ↗
Team workflowPartial

Monitor and Predict can deliver alerts to up to three teammates and include a pipeline, but no multi-user seats, assignments, comments or shared-workspace permissions are documented.

BidSkim pricing ↗BidSkim features ↗
Yes

A detailed live software page states unlimited user access for the whole team. Assignments, shared notes and other in-product collaboration mechanics are not stated.

Detailed software page ↗
Bid writingNot offered

The pricing FAQ explicitly says BidSkim does not write bids and focuses on finding, qualifying and researching opportunities before the bid.

BidSkim pricing ↗
Yes

The current offer includes complete managed bid reviews, bid writing and bespoke consultancy delivered through a named trusted partner, though it is not software functionality.

Current pricing ↗Product overview ↗
Evidence differences

Where the public evidence separates them

BidSkim is stronger on

AI or semantic matching, Buyer profiles, Supplier profiles, Buyer requirements, Requirements planning

Contracts Advance is stronger on

Exports or API, Team workflow, Bid writing

Same evidence status

Renewals, Similar contracts, Buyer document corpus, Award history, Frameworks, Competitor tracking

Practical fit

Which should make your shortlist?

Shortlist BidSkim when

British suppliers wanting profile-based qualification and links back to official notices.

Public-evidence advantages: AI or semantic matching, Buyer profiles, Supplier profiles, Buyer requirements, Requirements planning.

Watch for: Teams needing managed bid writing or coverage outside Great Britain. The provider says it does not write bids. Its score is a qualification aid, not a buyer decision or award forecast.

Shortlist Contracts Advance when

Established UK suppliers wanting alerts and progressively deeper contract intelligence.

Public-evidence advantages: Exports or API, Team workflow, Bid writing.

Watch for: Small suppliers looking for a monthly self-serve entry plan. The broad source statement needs source-by-source testing against the portals that matter to your market.

Commercial context

What the headline prices leave out

BidSkim pricing context

Free: £0. Monitor: £79/month or £780/year. Predict: £189/month or £1,860/year.

Plan names and prices were checked against BidSkim's public pricing page. Civensa and BidSkim have the same operator; see the ownership disclosure.

BidSkim pricing ↗BidSkim terms ↗

Contracts Advance pricing context

Search: £1,399/year. Discover: £2,099/year. Explore: £2,999/year. Prices exclude VAT.

Plans are annual. Confirm users, profiles, source coverage, onboarding and multiyear terms.

Current pricing ↗Detailed software page ↗
Coverage

Named portals, not just source-count claims

BidSkim

Provider states Britain-wide coverage from Find a Tender, Contracts Finder, Public Contracts Scotland and Sell2Wales.

4 individually named portals: Find a Tender, Contracts Finder, Public Contracts Scotland, Sell2Wales.

Contracts Advance

The provider says it monitors open public-procurement portals but does not publish a complete named-source list.

0 individually named portals: none established on the reviewed public pages.

Before buying

Questions to test with Contracts Advance

  1. Can Contracts Advance provide the current complete portal list, ingestion method, refresh cadence and monitored coverage report?
  2. How is each likely re-tender date derived, adjusted for extensions and confidence-scored, and how often are forecasts validated against actual publications?
  3. How are buyer and supplier identities canonicalised across aliases, corporate groups, mergers and spelling variants?
  4. What export formats, API or CRM options, role permissions and audit trails are included in each plan?
  5. Can the provider supply a DPA, subprocessor list, security-control summary, backup/recovery objectives, incident-notification terms and support SLA?
  6. Which pricing table is current, and how do the 60-day auto-renewal notice and greater-of-5%-or-CPI uplift apply to multi-year agreements?

Read the full BidSkim audit · Read the full Contracts Advance audit · Read the scoring methodology

Keep comparing
Verification boundary: The scoring is a directory aid built from public provider material and official records. It does not replace a trial using known notices, a coverage check against your target portals or a dated commercial quote.