← All BidSkim comparisons
Tender intelligence comparison

BidSkim vs myTenders

BidSkim has the higher current public-evidence score: 83/100 versus 29/100. Compare the underlying features, price references and public evidence before deciding which product fits your workflow.

Scores and prices

The two products at a glance

Tender intelligence product

BidSkim

83/100

BidSkim says it scores public-sector notices against a supplier profile and sends a daily shortlist with reasons.

Feature score83
Value score84
Complete features9/14
Tender-alert benchmark
£0/mo
Free
Full-package benchmark
£155/mo
Predict
Full intelligenceSmart matchers
Tender intelligence product

myTenders

29/100

myTenders gives suppliers free access to notices published through its buyer portal and offers alerts.

Feature score5
Value score80
Complete features0/14
Tender-alert benchmark
0/mo
Free supplier registration
Full-package benchmark
0/mo
Free supplier registration
Lite alerting

The combined score is 68% feature depth and 32% value. A complete feature scores more than a partial feature. Value considers both the tender-alert and full-package price benchmarks, price transparency and billing basis. Features may sit on higher tiers than the headline alert plan.

Feature evidence

Fourteen capabilities compared

Yes requires public evidence that the complete capability exists in at least one current plan. Partial means narrower or adjacent functionality. If the research did not establish the capability, it is marked not offered.

CapabilityBidSkimmyTenders
AI or semantic matchingYes

Monitor and Predict provide complete ongoing profile-based matching: every new notice is scored 0-100 against services, region, value and certifications with written reasons. The Free plan's one-off scan is plan gating, not an incomplete paid capability.

BidSkim features ↗BidSkim pricing ↗
Not offered

The reviewed myTenders supplier pages did not establish AI, semantic or profile-based opportunity matching.

Buyer profilesYes

Predict includes structured cross-notice buyer profiles with requirements, spend and award history, top suppliers, contacts, renewals and researched notes. Public data documentation states that repeated notices are deduplicated and lifecycle notices are connected; Predict gating does not downgrade the capability.

BidSkim features ↗BidSkim pricing ↗BidSkim data coverage ↗
Partial

Suppliers can search for a buying organisation and open its Buyer Profile listing that buyer's notices; PRO buyers can also buy a branded profile page that automatically lists their publications. These are notice pages rather than resolved buyer intelligence, with no canonicalisation, aliases, spend or cross-source history.

myTenders supplier FAQ ↗myTenders PRO ↗
Supplier profilesYes

Predict includes structured supplier and incumbent profiles that aggregate wins, buyers, regions, categories, awarded values, held contracts and renewal exposure across the award record. This is a complete current-plan capability even though public pages do not describe the exact alias-resolution algorithm.

BidSkim features ↗BidSkim terms ↗
Not offered

Supplier registration collects the user's own organisation details, but the reviewed pages did not establish structured competitor, incumbent or winner profiles.

RenewalsYes

Predict provides complete renewal timing signals built from public award, contract, modification and termination records. Exact dates, durations and extension options are converted into source-linked planning dates, refreshed daily and ranked against the subscriber profile; the provider explicitly distinguishes these from confirmed re-tender dates.

BidSkim features ↗BidSkim data coverage ↗BidSkim pricing ↗BidSkim contract timing method ↗
Not offered

The reviewed myTenders supplier pages did not establish contract-expiry, renewal or re-tender monitoring.

Similar contractsYes

Predict surfaces comparable historical awards matched by contract scope rather than shared keywords, including winners, values, terms, bid counts and SME status where published. Higher-tier gating does not make the implemented capability partial.

BidSkim features ↗BidSkim data coverage ↗
Not offered

The reviewed myTenders supplier pages did not establish surfacing of comparable historical contracts or awards.

Buyer document corpusNot offered

The reviewed public pages do not establish a full searchable corpus of buyer-authored documents designed to surface upcoming work.

BidSkim product ↗BidSkim features ↗
Not offered

Buyer-side PRO can attach tender documents to notices, but the reviewed supplier pages did not establish plans, strategies, minutes, budgets or other buyer documents beyond procurement notices.

Buyer requirementsYes

Predict buyer profiles organize insurance, certifications, social-value rules, local preferences and pass/fail gates drawn from public buyer records and documents. The capability is complete on Predict; Monitor exclusion is plan gating.

BidSkim features ↗BidSkim pricing ↗
Not offered

The reviewed myTenders supplier pages did not establish extracted or organised participation conditions, evaluation criteria or recurring buyer requirements.

Requirements planningPartial

Predict is positioned for preparing certifications, evidence and answers before a tender goes live using buyer requirements and likely renewals; no separate task-based readiness workflow is described.

BidSkim pricing ↗BidSkim features ↗
Not offered

The reviewed myTenders supplier pages did not establish supplier readiness, gap, evidence or requirements-planning workflows.

Award historyYes

The service offers a one-off 12-month matched-award report on Free and five years of connected buyer and award history, comparable awards and supplier intelligence on Predict. Tier-specific lookback and access do not make the capability partial.

BidSkim data coverage ↗BidSkim features ↗
Not offered

The reviewed myTenders supplier pages did not establish historical award search, winners or award-value intelligence.

FrameworksYes

BidSkim badges frameworks, DPS and dynamic markets, filters out non-joinable call-offs and modifications, and shows application/end dates, supplier caps and route-in information.

BidSkim features ↗
Not offered

The reviewed myTenders supplier pages did not establish framework, DPS, dynamic-market or route-to-market intelligence.

Competitor trackingYes

Predict provides complete named-supplier tracking across public-sector wins, buyers, awarded values, regions, categories and contracts nearing expiry. Monitor exclusion is plan gating, not an incomplete implementation.

BidSkim features ↗BidSkim pricing ↗
Not offered

The reviewed myTenders supplier pages did not establish competitor, incumbent, supplier or winner monitoring.

Exports or APINot offered

No CSV/Excel export, API, webhook or CRM integration is documented on the reviewed pages; the pricing page says large teams needing exports may be better served by enterprise platforms.

BidSkim pricing ↗
Not offered

The reviewed myTenders supplier pages did not establish CSV/Excel export, an API, webhook, CRM or another supplier-data integration.

Team workflowPartial

Monitor and Predict can deliver alerts to up to three teammates and include a pipeline, but no multi-user seats, assignments, comments or shared-workspace permissions are documented.

BidSkim pricing ↗BidSkim features ↗
Not offered

The reviewed supplier pages did not establish multiple supplier users, assignments, comments or a shared bid pipeline. Buyer-side PRO has separate multi-user and procurement-management features.

Bid writingNot offered

The pricing FAQ explicitly says BidSkim does not write bids and focuses on finding, qualifying and researching opportunities before the bid.

BidSkim pricing ↗
Not offered

The reviewed myTenders supplier pages did not establish bid-response drafting, an answer library, document analysis or managed writing support.

Evidence differences

Where the public evidence separates them

BidSkim is stronger on

AI or semantic matching, Buyer profiles, Supplier profiles, Renewals, Similar contracts, Buyer requirements, Requirements planning, Award history, Frameworks, Competitor tracking, Team workflow

myTenders is stronger on

No normalized capability has a stronger status than BidSkim in the current audit.

Same evidence status

Buyer document corpus, Exports or API, Bid writing

Practical fit

Which should make your shortlist?

Shortlist BidSkim when

British suppliers wanting profile-based qualification and links back to official notices.

Public-evidence advantages: AI or semantic matching, Buyer profiles, Supplier profiles, Renewals, Similar contracts, Buyer requirements, Requirements planning, Award history, Frameworks, Competitor tracking, Team workflow.

Watch for: Teams needing managed bid writing or coverage outside Great Britain. The provider says it does not write bids. Its score is a qualification aid, not a buyer decision or award forecast.

Shortlist myTenders when

Suppliers supplementing official searches with notices issued through myTenders.

Public-evidence advantages: none over BidSkim in the current normalized audit.

Watch for: Anyone treating it as a complete UK-wide alert feed. The provider explicitly limits its free opportunity search to notices published through its portal.

Commercial context

What the headline prices leave out

BidSkim pricing context

Free: £0. Monitor: £79/month or £780/year. Predict: £189/month or £1,860/year.

Plan names and prices were checked against BidSkim's public pricing page. Civensa and BidSkim have the same operator; see the ownership disclosure.

BidSkim pricing ↗BidSkim terms ↗

myTenders pricing context

Supplier registration and use of myTenders: free. No public price found for optional alert add-ons.

Free access does not mean coverage of every UK procurement source.

myTenders home ↗Supplier registration ↗
Coverage

Named portals, not just source-count claims

BidSkim

Provider states Britain-wide coverage from Find a Tender, Contracts Finder, Public Contracts Scotland and Sell2Wales.

4 individually named portals: Find a Tender, Contracts Finder, Public Contracts Scotland, Sell2Wales.

myTenders

Limited to notices published through myTenders; the provider points to Tenders Direct for wider aggregation.

3 individually named portals: myTenders, Find a Tender, Contracts Finder.

Before buying

Questions to test with myTenders

  1. Does myTenders currently sell its own supplier Alerts Service, and if so what keywords, price, cadence and portal-only coverage apply?
  2. Does supplier search ingest any notices not natively published through myTenders, or are FTS and Contracts Finder integrations outbound only?
  3. What Procurement Act 2023 notice forms and compliance checks have replaced or supplemented the advertised PCR 2015 workflow?
  4. Which Proactis ISO 27001 scope covers myTenders, and what encryption, MFA, hosting, backup and recovery controls apply to supplier submissions?
  5. Can organisations have multiple supplier users and shared response permissions, and can their Interest List and documents be exported?
  6. How are duplicate buyer and supplier registrations prevented or merged, and are company numbers validated?

Read the full BidSkim audit · Read the full myTenders audit · Read the scoring methodology

Keep comparing
Verification boundary: The scoring is a directory aid built from public provider material and official records. It does not replace a trial using known notices, a coverage check against your target portals or a dated commercial quote.