Yes means the complete normalized capability is available in at least one current plan. Partial means the implementation is adjacent, incomplete or materially narrower. Missing public evidence defaults to not offered.
AI or semantic matching
YesTenderLedger applies AI summarisation and opportunity scoring against supplier fit for bid/no-bid qualification. Its saved-search alerts remain criteria-based, but the current AI qualification workflow satisfies profile-based relevance matching.
TenderLedger features ↗TenderLedger MCP tools ↗Buyer profiles
PartialBuyer intelligence covers procurement rhythm, category behaviour and award outcomes, and the MCP service exposes a compact cross-notice buyer profile. The provider does not document authority-name canonicalisation, aliases, deduplication or entity-resolution controls.
TenderLedger buyer intelligence ↗TenderLedger MCP tools ↗Supplier profiles
PartialSupplier intelligence includes recent winners, market share, comparisons and compact cross-notice competitor profiles. The provider does not document supplier-name canonicalisation, company-number matching, aliases, deduplication or entity resolution.
TenderLedger award tracking ↗TenderLedger MCP tools ↗Renewals
YesPro includes renewal signals, likely re-tenders and a 90-day radar derived from published start dates, durations and extension options. The provider describes each re-tender window as an estimate linked to the award source.
TenderLedger overview and renewal methodology ↗TenderLedger pricing ↗Similar contracts
YesThe provider says each open tender has its history attached, including the incumbent and award record, and combines opportunity, buyer and award context in one view.
TenderLedger overview ↗TenderLedger procurement intelligence ↗Buyer document corpus
Not offeredThe reviewed first-party pages did not establish a library of buyer plans, strategies, minutes, budgets or other buyer-authored documents beyond procurement notices.
Buyer requirements
Not offeredAI summaries and qualification are advertised, but the reviewed pages did not establish structured extraction of participation conditions, certifications, policies or evaluation criteria.
Requirements planning
Not offeredBid/no-bid qualification support is advertised, but no requirements-gap, readiness-action or evidence-planning workflow was established on the reviewed pages.
Award history
YesHistorical award data includes award notices, contract values, winning suppliers, incumbents and buyer information, filterable by sector, buyer or supplier.
TenderLedger award tracking ↗Frameworks
PartialThe intelligence pages say framework call-offs and DPS activity are represented in buyer and award patterns, but the reviewed pages do not establish a complete dedicated framework-discovery module.
TenderLedger procurement intelligence ↗TenderLedger buyer intelligence ↗Competitor tracking
YesPro includes complete named competitor, incumbent and buyer tracking, including supplier comparisons and alerts for competitor wins. The higher-tier restriction is recorded as plan gating rather than an incomplete feature.
TenderLedger pricing ↗TenderLedger Slack integration ↗Exports or API
YesEnterprise includes custom exports and integrations. A gated MCP/REST service exposes capped structured JSON tools; production keys and higher quotas require access.
TenderLedger pricing ↗TenderLedger MCP tools ↗Team workflow
YesEnterprise includes multi-user access, and Pro includes saved-market Slack alerts routed to a configured team channel. Public seat counts and task-assignment depth are not stated, but a complete multi-user capability exists on a current plan.
TenderLedger pricing ↗TenderLedger Slack integration ↗Bid writing
Not offeredThe provider explicitly states that TenderLedger is not bid-writing software.
TenderLedger overview ↗