← All BidSkim comparisons
Tender intelligence comparison

BidSkim vs CleanTender

BidSkim has the higher current public-evidence score: 83/100 versus 58/100. Compare the underlying features, price references and public evidence before deciding which product fits your workflow.

Scores and prices

The two products at a glance

Tender intelligence product

BidSkim

83/100

BidSkim says it scores public-sector notices against a supplier profile and sends a daily shortlist with reasons.

Feature score83
Value score84
Complete features9/14
Tender-alert benchmark
£0/mo
Free
Full-package benchmark
£155/mo
Predict
Full intelligenceSmart matchers
Tender intelligence product

CleanTender

58/100

CleanTender focuses discovery and qualification on cleaning, security, grounds, waste and catering contracts.

Feature score42
Value score91
Complete features6/14
Tender-alert benchmark
£0/mo
Radar
Full-package benchmark
£82.50/mo
Pro
Intelligence + workflowSmart matchers

The combined score is 68% feature depth and 32% value. A complete feature scores more than a partial feature. Value considers both the tender-alert and full-package price benchmarks, price transparency and billing basis. Features may sit on higher tiers than the headline alert plan.

Feature evidence

Fourteen capabilities compared

Yes requires public evidence that the complete capability exists in at least one current plan. Partial means narrower or adjacent functionality. If the research did not establish the capability, it is marked not offered.

CapabilityBidSkimCleanTender
AI or semantic matchingYes

Monitor and Predict provide complete ongoing profile-based matching: every new notice is scored 0-100 against services, region, value and certifications with written reasons. The Free plan's one-off scan is plan gating, not an incomplete paid capability.

BidSkim features ↗BidSkim pricing ↗
Yes

Pro provides profile-based matching and AI qualification: alerts use the stored company profile and threshold, and the evaluator compares the full contract pack with more than 30 profile fields. Plan gating and scan caps do not make the implemented capability partial.

Features ↗Compliance evaluator ↗Terms ↗
Buyer profilesYes

Predict includes structured cross-notice buyer profiles with requirements, spend and award history, top suppliers, contacts, renewals and researched notes. Public data documentation states that repeated notices are deduplicated and lifecycle notices are connected; Predict gating does not downgrade the capability.

BidSkim features ↗BidSkim pricing ↗BidSkim data coverage ↗
Not offered

Structured contracting-authority profiles or buyer intelligence are not stated on the reviewed product pages.

Supplier profilesYes

Predict includes structured supplier and incumbent profiles that aggregate wins, buyers, regions, categories, awarded values, held contracts and renewal exposure across the award record. This is a complete current-plan capability even though public pages do not describe the exact alias-resolution algorithm.

BidSkim features ↗BidSkim terms ↗
Not offered

The product has a user's own company compliance profile, which does not meet this schema's supplier-profile definition. A public Verified Supplier Directory is explicitly marked coming soon rather than available.

Features ↗Pricing ↗
RenewalsYes

Predict provides complete renewal timing signals built from public award, contract, modification and termination records. Exact dates, durations and extension options are converted into source-linked planning dates, refreshed daily and ranked against the subscriber profile; the provider explicitly distinguishes these from confirmed re-tender dates.

BidSkim features ↗BidSkim data coverage ↗BidSkim pricing ↗BidSkim contract timing method ↗
Not offered

The Compliance Vault tracks the customer's certificate and policy expiry dates, but contract expiry, renewal or re-tender monitoring is not stated.

Similar contractsYes

Predict surfaces comparable historical awards matched by contract scope rather than shared keywords, including winners, values, terms, bid counts and SME status where published. Higher-tier gating does not make the implemented capability partial.

BidSkim features ↗BidSkim data coverage ↗
Yes

Public contract records include a Browse similar tenders route and surface other open opportunities in the same sector or from the same buyer.

Example contract record ↗
Buyer document corpusNot offered

The reviewed public pages do not establish a full searchable corpus of buyer-authored documents designed to surface upcoming work.

BidSkim product ↗BidSkim features ↗
Not offered

The reviewed public pages do not establish a full searchable corpus of buyer-authored documents designed to surface upcoming work.

Compliance evaluator ↗
Buyer requirementsYes

Predict buyer profiles organize insurance, certifications, social-value rules, local preferences and pass/fail gates drawn from public buyer records and documents. The capability is complete on Predict; Monitor exclusion is plan gating.

BidSkim features ↗BidSkim pricing ↗
Yes

The Pro compliance evaluator reads tender requirements and organises insurance, accreditation, policy, experience and other requirements and gaps by severity. Its monthly cap is recorded as a commercial limit, not a partial implementation.

Compliance evaluator ↗Pricing ↗
Requirements planningPartial

Predict is positioned for preparing certifications, evidence and answers before a tender goes live using buyer requirements and likely renewals; no separate task-based readiness workflow is described.

BidSkim pricing ↗BidSkim features ↗
Partial

The compliance evaluator produces a structured gap list and submission checklist, but scans are limited by plan and month.

Compliance evaluator ↗Terms ↗
Award historyYes

The service offers a one-off 12-month matched-award report on Free and five years of connected buyer and award history, comparable awards and supplier intelligence on Predict. Tier-specific lookback and access do not make the capability partial.

BidSkim data coverage ↗BidSkim features ↗
Not offered

Historical award notices, supplier winners, award values or a dedicated award search are not stated on the reviewed product pages.

FrameworksYes

BidSkim badges frameworks, DPS and dynamic markets, filters out non-joinable call-offs and modifications, and shows application/end dates, supplier caps and route-in information.

BidSkim features ↗
Partial

The tender directory contains individual framework opportunities, but a dedicated framework, DPS or dynamic-market intelligence tool is not stated.

Example framework record ↗
Competitor trackingYes

Predict provides complete named-supplier tracking across public-sector wins, buyers, awarded values, regions, categories and contracts nearing expiry. Monitor exclusion is plan gating, not an incomplete implementation.

BidSkim features ↗BidSkim pricing ↗
Not offered

Named competitor, incumbent, supplier or winner monitoring is not stated on the reviewed product pages.

Exports or APINot offered

No CSV/Excel export, API, webhook or CRM integration is documented on the reviewed pages; the pricing page says large teams needing exports may be better served by enterprise platforms.

BidSkim pricing ↗
Yes

Pro bid drafts can be exported to Word, PDF, Markdown or plain text. Tender-data export, API, webhook and CRM integration are not stated.

AI bid drafts ↗
Team workflowPartial

Monitor and Predict can deliver alerts to up to three teammates and include a pipeline, but no multi-user seats, assignments, comments or shared-workspace permissions are documented.

BidSkim pricing ↗BidSkim features ↗
Yes

One Pro company subscription covers the whole bid team without gated seats, using a shared company profile and shared documents. Assignments, comments and a shared bid pipeline are not stated.

Pricing ↗
Bid writingNot offered

The pricing FAQ explicitly says BidSkim does not write bids and focuses on finding, qualifying and researching opportunities before the bid.

BidSkim pricing ↗
Yes

Pro provides a complete drafting workflow for editable, exportable Selection Questionnaire and Social Value responses using the company profile and contract pack. The free tier does not include bid drafting.

AI bid drafts ↗Pricing ↗
Evidence differences

Where the public evidence separates them

BidSkim is stronger on

Buyer profiles, Supplier profiles, Renewals, Award history, Frameworks, Competitor tracking

CleanTender is stronger on

Exports or API, Team workflow, Bid writing

Same evidence status

AI or semantic matching, Similar contracts, Buyer document corpus, Buyer requirements, Requirements planning

Practical fit

Which should make your shortlist?

Shortlist BidSkim when

British suppliers wanting profile-based qualification and links back to official notices.

Public-evidence advantages: Buyer profiles, Supplier profiles, Renewals, Award history, Frameworks, Competitor tracking.

Watch for: Teams needing managed bid writing or coverage outside Great Britain. The provider says it does not write bids. Its score is a qualification aid, not a buyer decision or award forecast.

Shortlist CleanTender when

UK soft-facilities-management suppliers that want a sector-specific view.

Public-evidence advantages: Exports or API, Team workflow, Bid writing.

Watch for: Suppliers outside the supported sectors or those needing devolved-source coverage. This is a category-limited product using two named feeds, not a complete UK market database.

Commercial context

What the headline prices leave out

BidSkim pricing context

Free: £0. Monitor: £79/month or £780/year. Predict: £189/month or £1,860/year.

Plan names and prices were checked against BidSkim's public pricing page. Civensa and BidSkim have the same operator; see the ownership disclosure.

BidSkim pricing ↗BidSkim terms ↗

CleanTender pricing context

Browsing and profile tools are advertised as free. Pro is listed at £99/month.

Confirm VAT, drafting allowance, notice history, user limits and renewal terms.

Pricing ↗Terms ↗
Coverage

Named portals, not just source-count claims

BidSkim

Provider states Britain-wide coverage from Find a Tender, Contracts Finder, Public Contracts Scotland and Sell2Wales.

4 individually named portals: Find a Tender, Contracts Finder, Public Contracts Scotland, Sell2Wales.

CleanTender

Find a Tender and Contracts Finder, according to the provider.

2 individually named portals: Find a Tender, Contracts Finder.

Before buying

Questions to test with CleanTender

  1. Which live portals are actually ingested beyond Find a Tender and Contracts Finder, and what is the cadence and success rate for each?
  2. What happens when a contract pack is missing, access-controlled, changed after ingestion or too large for the evaluator?
  3. Can the provider supply its DPA, subprocessor-change process, security testing evidence, backup and recovery objectives and incident-notification commitment?
  4. Are evaluations, gaps and documents visible to every team member, and are role-based permissions, assignments or audit history available?
  5. How are false-positive and false-negative fit scores measured and corrected across Soft FM categories?
  6. When will the public supplier directory launch, and what identity verification and canonicalisation will it use?

Read the full BidSkim audit · Read the full CleanTender audit · Read the scoring methodology

Keep comparing
Verification boundary: The scoring is a directory aid built from public provider material and official records. It does not replace a trial using known notices, a coverage check against your target portals or a dated commercial quote.