AI or semantic matching
YesEvery tender is scored 0-100 against a personalised business profile using claimed semantic understanding, with BID, FLAG or SKIP rationale.
Product and pricing ↗TenderAI sells a low-touch, per-profile email briefing for UK SMEs: two official feeds are scored against a provider-managed business profile and reduced to a short BID/FLAG/SKIP list. The offer is simple and inexpensive to operate, but the public surface gives little evidence of workflow depth, legal maturity, information-security controls or data infrastructure beyond the daily digest.
Yes means the complete normalized capability is available in at least one current plan. Partial means the implementation is adjacent, incomplete or materially narrower. Missing public evidence defaults to not offered.
Every tender is scored 0-100 against a personalised business profile using claimed semantic understanding, with BID, FLAG or SKIP rationale.
Product and pricing ↗Buyer names appear in briefs, but the reviewed pages do not establish structured buyer-intelligence profiles.
The customer's own business profile does not establish supplier, incumbent, winner or competitor profiles.
The reviewed pages do not establish contract expiry, renewal, extension or re-tender monitoring.
The provider says it validates profiles against past tenders a customer would have won, but does not establish a user-facing similar-contract feature.
The reviewed pages do not establish buyer plans, strategies, minutes, pipelines, budgets or other buyer-authored documents.
Match rationales are described, but the reviewed pages do not establish extracted participation conditions, evaluation criteria or recurring buyer requirements.
The reviewed pages do not establish readiness actions, evidence planning or a requirements gap workflow.
The reviewed pages describe live tender opportunities, not historical awards, winners or award search.
Example briefs include DPS opportunities, but the reviewed pages do not establish dedicated framework, DPS or dynamic-market discovery or intelligence.
The reviewed pages do not establish named competitor, incumbent, supplier or winner monitoring.
The reviewed pages do not establish CSV, spreadsheet, API, webhook, CRM or other data export or integration.
The reviewed pages do not establish multiple users, assignments, comments or a shared team pipeline.
TenderAI says it finds and scores opportunities for the customer to decide on, but the reviewed pages do not expressly establish or exclude bid-writing functionality.
| Plan | Pay monthly per month | Pay annually per year | Annual effective per month | Basis | Included users | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free weekly digest | 0 | Not published | Not published | per organisation | Not publicly stated | Free weekly digest; no credit card required. This is a digest rather than the personalised daily paid profile. |
| Paid profile (unnamed) | £99 | Not published | Not published | per organisation | Not publicly stated; one business profile | The page publishes no formal plan name and prices per profile. First month is free; annual billing and VAT treatment are not published. |
Trial: First month free and cancel anytime. The page says no card is charged for 30 days, but does not clearly state whether a card is required for the paid-plan trial; the separate weekly digest says no credit card is needed. VAT: VAT treatment is not publicly stated on the reviewed page.
Product and pricing ↗The reviewed site identifies only the TenderAI brand and brief@tenderai.uk contact, describes 16 active business profiles and a first cohort, and publishes beta-customer testimonials. No registered operator, company number, terms, privacy policy, data-processing terms, physical address or official corporate record was found on the reviewed first-party surface.
TenderAI product page ↗TenderAI explicitly targets UK SMEs without dedicated bid teams across IT, construction, facilities management, consulting, training, health and social care, waste and catering. The intended job is to replace 30-60 minutes of daily manual screening with a two-minute email decision list.
TenderAI product page ↗The paid offer is £99 per month per business profile with unlimited opportunities, cancel-anytime billing and a free first month; a free weekly digest is also offered. The page says no card is charged for 30 days but does not state clearly whether payment details are required to begin, and no annual, team or enterprise schedule is published.
TenderAI pricing ↗Onboarding is a 15-minute call or email exchange, with profile setup promised within hours and ongoing changes by reply email. The reviewed public surface does not state the legal controller, hosting region, authentication model, encryption, retention, sub-processors, tenant isolation, support SLA, security certification or incident route.
Concierge onboarding and FAQ ↗The current product names exactly two sources: Find a Tender Service and Contracts Finder, aggregated under the Open Government Licence. It claims roughly 100,000 notices per year and broader UK-public-sector coverage, but provides no source inventory beyond those two feeds and no independent completeness evidence.
Product coverage FAQ ↗Daily digest source note ↗The provider says it scans opportunities daily, updates the public digest daily and sends customer briefs each morning, with the first brief at 04:00 UTC after profile setup. It does not publish feed polling intervals, deduplication rules, correction handling, status history, measured ingestion lag or a freshness SLA.
TenderAI product and delivery FAQ ↗Public daily digest ↗A concierge-built profile records sector, keywords, sectors served, CPV codes and value range; TenderAI says it validates this profile against past tenders and then applies 0-100 BID, FLAG or SKIP scoring with plain-English rationale. Profile changes are provider-managed by email within 24 hours and self-serve editing is only coming soon.
How it works and FAQ ↗Public scored digest ↗TenderAI says it validates a new profile against past tenders the customer would have won, but this is an onboarding method rather than a user-facing history or awards product. No award search, winner/value history, linked notice chain or customer-accessible historical depth was established.
How it works ↗Buyer names appear in tender briefs, but no canonical buyer record, alias handling, duplicate merging, buyer history or cross-notice buyer profile was documented.
Public daily digest ↗The personalised business profile is the subscriber's matching configuration, not a supplier-intelligence entity. No winner, incumbent, competitor, alias or cross-award supplier model was found.
TenderAI product page ↗The reviewed pages do not document published contract-end monitoring, calculated expiry windows, extension tracking, predicted re-tender timing or confirmed future-notice linkage.
BID/FLAG/SKIP rationales help triage opportunities, but no requirement extraction, evidence-gap register, owner/action/deadline workflow or readiness state was documented.
TenderAI product page ↗The operational surface is an emailed top-ten brief with links to original tender pages and provider-managed profile updates. No CSV/API, CRM or messaging integration, assignments, shared workspace, multi-user controls, comments or tender pipeline was documented.
TenderAI product page ↗Explicitly named as one of the two currently integrated data sources.
Product coverage FAQ ↗Explicitly named as one of the two currently integrated data sources.
Product coverage FAQ ↗